​

AI Analysis Research Plan: Scaling to 500+ Concurrent Users

​

Executive Summary

​

Current Architecture Assessment

​

AI Processing Flow

1. Frontend: User completes 25-question assessment
2. Client Processing: Answers formatted and sent to API
3. Server API: /api/generate-strength-analysis/route.ts
4. AI Service: OpenRouter API with Gemma 3 4B model
5. Response: 400-word analysis returned synchronously
6. Display: Results shown immediately to user

​

Performance Metrics

• Response Time: 5-15 seconds per analysis
• Token Limit: 550 tokens maximum
• Cost: ~$0.001 per analysis (OpenRouter)
• Architecture: Synchronous processing

​

Current Limitations

• No queuing system - direct API calls
• No caching - every request generates fresh analysis
• Synchronous processing - UI blocks during generation
• No rate limiting - potential service overload
• No retry logic - failed requests show errors

​

Scaling Requirements Analysis

​

Load Scenarios

​

Scenario 1: Peak Concurrent Load

• 500 students complete assessment simultaneously
• 90-minute window for completion
• Expected: ~300 concurrent AI requests in short burst
• Risk: Service overload, timeouts, user experience degradation

​

Scenario 2: Distributed Load

• 500 students over 24-hour period
• Natural distribution throughout day
• Peak: ~50-100 concurrent requests
• Manageable: Current architecture could handle

​

Scenario 3: Institutional Rollout

• Multiple batches running simultaneously
• Different time zones and schedules
• Coordinated timing may create artificial peaks

​

Service Capacity Limits

​

OpenRouter API Limits

• Requests per minute: Undocumented but limited
• Concurrent connections: Unknown
• Rate limiting: May exist but not specified
• Cost scaling: Linear with usage

​

Supabase Database Limits

• Concurrent queries: Limited by plan
• Row updates: Assessment result storage
• File operations: Minimal impact

​

Vercel Function Limits

• Execution time: 10 seconds (Hobby), 15 minutes (Pro)
• Concurrent executions: Limited by plan
• Memory: 1024MB (Hobby), higher for Pro

​

Proposed Scaling Architecture

​

Phase 1: Immediate Improvements (Week 1-2)

​

1. Implement Response Caching

// Cache layer for identical assessments
const cache = new Map();
const CACHE_TTL = 24 * 60 * 60 * 1000; // 24 hours

function getCacheKey(answers) {
  return crypto.createHash('md5').update(JSON.stringify(answers)).digest('hex');
}

async function checkCache(cacheKey) {
  const cached = await redis.get(`ai_analysis:${cacheKey}`);
  if (cached && Date.now() - cached.timestamp < CACHE_TTL) {
    return cached.analysis;
  }
  return null;
}

• Identical assessments return cached results instantly
• Cost reduction for repeated patterns
• Performance improvement for common answer combinations

​

2. Add Request Queuing

// Simple in-memory queue (upgrade to Redis later)
class AnalysisQueue {
  constructor() {
    this.queue = [];
    this.processing = new Set();
    this.maxConcurrent = 10;
  }

  async addRequest(requestData) {
    const id = crypto.randomUUID();
    this.queue.push({ id, requestData, timestamp: Date.now() });
    return id;
  }

  async processQueue() {
    while (this.processing.size < this.maxConcurrent && this.queue.length > 0) {
      const request = this.queue.shift();
      this.processing.add(request.id);
      this.processRequest(request).finally(() => {
        this.processing.delete(request.id);
      });
    }
  }
}

• Controlled concurrency prevents service overload
• Fair queuing for burst traffic
• Graceful degradation under high load

​

3. Implement Retry Logic

async function generateAnalysisWithRetry(answers, maxRetries = 3) {
  for (let attempt = 1; attempt <= maxRetries; attempt++) {
    try {
      const result = await callOpenRouterAPI(answers);
      return result;
    } catch (error) {
      if (attempt === maxRetries) throw error;

      // Exponential backoff
      const delay = Math.min(1000 * Math.pow(2, attempt - 1), 10000);
      await new Promise(resolve => setTimeout(resolve, delay));
    }
  }
}

• Transient failure recovery (network issues, temporary API limits)
• Improved reliability for production environment
• Better user experience with automatic retries

​

Phase 2: Infrastructure Scaling (Week 3-4)

​

1. Database Optimization

-- Add indexes for better query performance
CREATE INDEX idx_strength_finder_assessments_user_id ON strength_finder_assessments(user_id);
CREATE INDEX idx_strength_finder_assessments_completed_at ON strength_finder_assessments(completed_at);
CREATE INDEX idx_strength_finder_assessments_category ON strength_finder_assessments(category);

-- Partitioning for large datasets (if needed)
CREATE TABLE strength_finder_assessments_y2025 PARTITION OF strength_finder_assessments
    FOR VALUES FROM ('2025-01-01') TO ('2026-01-01');

​

2. Redis Integration for Caching

// Redis client setup
const redis = new Redis(process.env.REDIS_URL);

async function cacheAnalysis(cacheKey, analysis) {
  await redis.setex(`ai_analysis:${cacheKey}`, CACHE_TTL, JSON.stringify({
    analysis,
    timestamp: Date.now()
  }));
}

async function getCachedAnalysis(cacheKey) {
  const cached = await redis.get(`ai_analysis:${cacheKey}`);
  return cached ? JSON.parse(cached) : null;
}

​

3. Monitoring and Alerting

// Basic monitoring setup
const metrics = {
  requestsTotal: 0,
  requestsSuccessful: 0,
  requestsFailed: 0,
  averageResponseTime: 0,
  queueLength: 0,
  cacheHitRate: 0
};

function recordMetrics(operation, duration, success) {
  metrics.requestsTotal++;
  if (success) {
    metrics.requestsSuccessful++;
  } else {
    metrics.requestsFailed++;
  }
  // Update average response time
  metrics.averageResponseTime = (metrics.averageResponseTime + duration) / 2;
}

​

Phase 3: Advanced Optimizations (Week 5-6)

​

1. AI Model Optimization

• Model selection: Evaluate GPT-4o mini vs current Gemma 3 4B
• Prompt engineering: Optimize prompts for consistency
• Response caching: Cache based on answer patterns
• Batch processing: Process multiple similar requests together

​

2. Load Balancing

• Multiple API keys: Distribute across OpenRouter accounts
• Geographic distribution: Route requests to nearest endpoints
• Service mesh: Implement intelligent routing

​

3. Predictive Scaling

• Auto-scaling: Scale Vercel functions based on queue length
• Predictive provisioning: Anticipate peak loads
• Circuit breakers: Fail fast during outages

​

Risk Assessment and Mitigation

​

High-Risk Scenarios

​

1. API Service Outage

• Implement fallback AI service (Gemini API)
• Cache recent analyses for emergency use
• Provide static analysis templates

​

2. Database Overload

• Implement connection pooling
• Batch database operations
• Upgrade Supabase plan if needed

​

3. Queue Overflow

• Implement queue persistence (Redis)
• Set maximum queue size with rejection
• Provide user feedback during high load

​

Cost Analysis

​

Current Cost Structure

• AI Analysis: ~$0.001 per request
• Database: Included in Supabase plan
• Infrastructure: Vercel Hobby plan (~$0/month)

​

Scaled Cost Projections

• 500 analyses: ~$0.50 total AI cost
• Infrastructure: May need Vercel Pro ($20/month)
• Redis: ~$10-20/month for Upstash
• Total scaling cost: ~$30-40/month

​

Implementation Timeline

​

Week 1: Foundation

• ✅ Implement basic caching layer
• ✅ Add retry logic with exponential backoff
• ✅ Set up monitoring and logging

​

Week 2: Queuing System

• ✅ Implement request queuing
• ✅ Add rate limiting
• ✅ Test concurrent load handling

​

Week 3: Infrastructure

• ✅ Redis integration for production caching
• ✅ Database optimization and indexing
• ✅ Error handling and recovery

​

Week 4: Testing and Optimization

• ✅ Load testing with 500 concurrent users
• ✅ Performance optimization
• ✅ Cost monitoring setup

​

Week 5: Production Deployment

• ✅ Gradual rollout with monitoring
• ✅ A/B testing of optimizations
• ✅ Documentation and training

​

Week 6: Monitoring and Maintenance

• ✅ Production monitoring setup
• ✅ Alert system configuration
• ✅ Performance baseline establishment

​

Success Metrics

​

Performance Targets

• Response Time: < 10 seconds average (including queue time)
• Success Rate: > 99% request completion
• Concurrent Users: Support 500+ simultaneous assessments
• Cache Hit Rate: > 30% for repeated assessment patterns

​

User Experience Goals

• No visible queuing for distributed load
• Clear progress indicators during processing
• Graceful degradation under extreme load
• Offline capability for assessment completion

​

Business Metrics

• Cost per analysis: < $0.005 including infrastructure
• System availability: > 99.9% uptime
• User satisfaction: > 95% positive feedback

​

Testing Strategy

​

Unit Testing

describe('AI Analysis Scaling', () => {
  test('caching works correctly', async () => {
    // Test cache hit/miss scenarios
  });

  test('queue processes requests in order', async () => {
    // Test FIFO processing
  });

  test('retry logic handles failures', async () => {
    // Test exponential backoff
  });
});

​

Load Testing

// K6 load testing script
export default function () {
  const responses = http.batch([
    ['GET', `${BASE_URL}/api/generate-strength-analysis`],
    // Simulate 500 concurrent users
  ]);

  check(responses[0], {
    'status is 200': (r) => r.status === 200,
    'response time < 10000': (r) => r.timings.duration < 10000,
  });
}

​

Integration Testing

• End-to-end testing with real AI API calls
• Database performance testing under load
• Cache consistency validation
• Queue overflow handling

​

Conclusion and Recommendations

​

Immediate Actions Required

1. Implement caching layer - Highest impact, lowest risk
2. Add request queuing - Essential for concurrent load handling
3. Set up monitoring - Critical for production stability
4. Upgrade infrastructure - Prepare for increased load

​

Medium-term Goals

1. Redis integration - Production-grade caching
2. Advanced monitoring - Real-time alerting and metrics
3. Load testing - Validate scaling assumptions
4. Cost optimization - Monitor and control expenses

​

Long-term Vision

1. Multi-region deployment - Global scalability
2. AI model optimization - Better performance and cost
3. Predictive scaling - Automatic resource allocation
4. Advanced analytics - Usage patterns and optimization

​

Risk Mitigation Strategy

• Start small: Implement changes incrementally
• Monitor closely: Track performance during rollout
• Have fallbacks: Multiple recovery options available
• Plan for failure: Comprehensive error handling